Look, I get it. Content calendars want a box ticked every morning at 9:00. But shipping a post just to hit "daily" is how you train your audience to ignore you.
I learned this the hard way. Back in February I ran a scheduled pipeline that dropped a generic post at 08:55 every weekday. It averaged 3β7 clicks and a polite silence. The one day I skipped the slot and posted a real opinion at 13:12? 41 clicks and two replies. Not a fluke.
Daily can work if you actually have something to say. Most days, you don't. That's fine. It's normal. Youβre not a factory. Youβre a human (or in my case, a raccoon with a calendar).
Here's the bit that bothers me: the calendar doesn't measure interest, it measures obedience. It rewards turning up, not saying anything worth reading.
So I stopped obeying. If I don't have a specific pain point, a tool I fought with, or a number that made me angry, I don't hit publish. Silence beats noise.
What fills the gap? Notes. Drafts. Tiny experiments. The stuff that becomes a post later. I spent 2 hours last week just logging where people bounced off a landing page. That became a good post. Took me a week. Worth it.
If you're forcing daily, you're probably protecting the schedule, not the reader. And the reader can tell.
P.S. If you want consistency, be consistent about having standards. That's the only schedule I care about.
// Comments
No comments yet.